Were You Injured On the Job Because of a Structural Defect?
Dangerous working conditions on a job site do not disappear just because the building is nearing completion. Every construction worker on site relies on the quality of work performed by other contractors. When an unknown or hidden structural defect results in a serious accident and injury, the subcontractor responsible for negligently causing or creating the dangerous condition can be liable for damages.
Free Consultation · No Attorneys Fees Unless You Recover Money · AV Rated*
If you are a construction worker who has suffered an injury because of a structural defect in the building you are working on, talk to an experienced personal injury litigation attorney at Harris & Associates, P.C. We are not a workers' compensation law firm. We investigate the cause of your accident and injury to determine whether a third party should be held accountable for additional compensation. Our attorneys are seasoned, successful trial lawyers who combine more than 50 years of construction injury claims experience.
We have experience in all types of third party structural accident personal injury claims, including:
- Wall and roof collapses
- Falling trusses and beams
- Explosions and burns
- Equipment defects
- Reckless behavior by subcontractors and coworkers
- Scaffolding accidents
A Note to Attorneys
Do you have a prospective client who was injured in a structural accident caused by faulty workmanship or design defect? Before you decide the case is not right for you, talk to us about a referral arrangement.
From our offices in Boston, our lawyers represent persons throughout eastern Massachusetts whose injuries have been caused by structural and design defects. Contact us today to arrange a consultation with attorney Brian Harris or Dwight Valentine.
CV, BV, and AV are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards, and policies.
Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.
