Jump to Navigation

Is Expert Testimony Always Necessary?

In a recent Superior Court case involving alleged negligent security at a Bruins hockey game in Boston, the judge decided, contrary to what many believe is established precendent, that the plaintiff does not need to produce expert testimony in order for his case to go on to trial. The judge found that professional ice hockey is "inherently violent" and that where frustrated fans are "fueled by a volatile mix of unbridled physicality and alcohol, fights at TD Garden are forseeable." As to whether security measures taken by the defendants to prevent the plaintiff's injuries during a fight between fans were adequate under the circumstances, the judge deferred to"the collective wisdom of the jury as fact-finders." Some say the judge's ruling will not be upheld on appeal due to earlier case law requiring expert testimony in similar negligent security cases; others hail the ruling as practical and grounded in reality.

Time and further litigation will tell. Now word on whether or not the judge is a hockey or contact sport fan.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
FindLaw Network
Need Legal Assistance?

Contact us to discuss your insurance claim dispute or tort litigation matter with one of our lawyers today.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Subscribe to this blog's feed
Office Location

Harris & Associates, P.C
15 Broad Street, Suite 701
Boston MA 02109

Telephone: 617-523-1100
Telephone: 617-275-2226
Fax: 617-523-2060

  • Avvo Rating 100 Superb Top Attorney Personal Injury
  • Massachusetts Bar Association
  • Peer Review Rated